On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Charles R Harris <[email protected] > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Bradley M. Froehle < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Targeting >= 2.6 would be preferable to me. Several other packages >> including IPython, support only Python >= 2.6, >= 3.2. >> >> This change would help me from accidentally writing Python syntax which >> is allowable in 2.6 & 2.7 (but not in 2.4 or 2.5). >> >> Compiling a newer Python interpreter isn't very hard… probably about as >> difficult as installing NumPy. >> >> -Brad >> >> >> On Thursday, December 13, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Skipper Seabold wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:00 PM, David Cournapeau >> > <[email protected](mailto: >> [email protected])> wrote: >> > <snip> >> > > I would even go as far as dropping 2.5 as well then (RHEL 6 >> > > uses python 2.6). >> > >> > +1 >> > +1 > > OK. Dropping support for python 2.4 looks like the majority opinion. I'll > put up another post for 2.5. Do we need to coordinate with scipy? > Not much to coordinate I think. I'll send a message to scipy-dev proposing to simply follow the Numpy decision. Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
