I think it is nearly complete. Although there are some recent changes that
need review.

I still need to go back and make changes to the original NEP noting the
differences in final implementation.


On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Charles R Harris <
charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Blake Griffith <
> blake.a.griff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would like to have the ufunc overrides in 1.8 if it is possible.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Charles R Harris <
>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't see any that *have* to go in, but there are a few that could be
>>> included. The most significant is probably the inplace fancy indexing if it
>>> is ready. The nanmean etc. functions are not committed yet, but I think
>>> they are ready. If the Polynomial import fixes show up, they can go in.
>>> There are the usual janitorial things,  the release notes need some clean
>>> up, the docs need merging, and the HOWTO_RELEASE document needs updating.
>>>
>>> For datetime64, I think a comment should be added to the release notes
>>> that it is still experimental and that changes are expected in 1.9.
>>> Hopefully the next release will come out next spring.
>>>
>>> I think we are also about ready for a 1.7.2 release.
>>>
>>>
>>>
> What is the status of that? I've been leaving that commit up the Pauli.
>
> Chuck
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to