-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 17.08.2013 21:20, Charles R Harris kirjoitti: [clip] > Experimental would be OK if it would help you with Scipy 0.13.0. > But if it does go in and is used in 0.13, won't that effectively > lock it in until the next scipy/numpy release? That seems a bit > dangerous if you think some changes might be warranted. OTOH, the > testing might be worth the risk... > > My hope is that the next numpy release take much less time than > 1.8, which is almost three releases worth of changes.
Ok, it starts to seem that it's a bit late also in the Scipy release schedule to get this in 0.13.0, as Ralf is planning to branch that on next Tuesday. The Numpy interactions may reveal some surprises, so I'd prefer this to cook for a while in the dev version. The best route is probably to postpone until 1.9 and 0.14.0, I think. - -- Pauli Virtanen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlIPxCIACgkQ6BQxb7O0pWBU3ACgy4NXXXyQJthIcGPD3GTDKljg G+wAoLVhEiH9bVjxfBswTSAP5fb+Tcsb =rKWa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
