Hi, Thanks a lot for your advice, Chuck. Following your advice, I have modified my draft of proposal. (attachment) I think it still needs more comments so that I can make it better.
And I found that maybe I can also make some functions related to linalg (like dot, svd or something else) faster by integrating a proper library into numpy. Regards, Leo Mao On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Leo Mao <lmao20...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Aron, >> >> Previously mentioned by Julian, Yeppp may be a good candidate. >> As for selecting a good library, I will consider the performance and the >> API of the library. >> The integration of the library should improve the performance of numpy >> and also not make the source too complicated to maintain. >> And I think the library should be mature so that the API will not be >> changed significantly. >> >> Please point out if there is something I miss. >> Also I will be grateful to any suggestions for my proposal. >> >> Regards, >> Leo Mao >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Aron Ahmadia <a...@ahmadia.net> wrote: >> >>> Hi Leo, >>> >>> Out of curiosity, which vector math libraries did you have in mind as >>> likely candidates for inclusion? How are you planning on selecting the >>> library to integrate? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Aron >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Leo Mao <lmao20...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> The attachment is my draft of proposal. The project is "vector math >>>> library integration". >>>> I think I need some feedback to make it solider. >>>> Any comment will be appreciated. >>>> Thanks in advance. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Leo Mao >>>> >>>> > The proposal as it stands is too open ended and lacking in specifics. > Probably you should select a library before the start of GSOC, or at least > have a list of candidates, and also narrow the part of numpy you want to > improve to something definite: linalg, special functions, etc. That doesn't > mean you can't do more if time allows ;) An estimate of expected gains over > current code would also help. > > Chuck > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
<<< text/html; charset=US-ASCII; name="proposal.html": Unrecognized >>>
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion