This id good for Numpyists but this will be another operator that good also help in another contexts.
As a math user, I was first very skeptical but finally this is a good news for non Numpyists too. Christophe BAL Le 15 mars 2014 02:01, "Frédéric Bastien" <no...@nouiz.org> a écrit : > This is great news. Excellent work Nathaniel and all others! > > Frédéric > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Aron Ahmadia <a...@ahmadia.net> wrote: > > That's the best news I've had all week. > > > > Thanks for all your work on this Nathan. > > > > -A > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> > >> Well, that was fast. Guido says he'll accept the addition of '@' as an > >> infix operator for matrix multiplication, once some details are ironed > >> out: > >> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-March/027109.html > >> http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0465/ > >> > >> Specifically, we need to figure out whether we want to make an > >> argument for a matrix power operator ("@@"), and what > >> precedence/associativity we want '@' to have. I'll post two separate > >> threads to get feedback on those in an organized way -- this is just a > >> heads-up. > >> > >> -n > >> > >> -- > >> Nathaniel J. Smith > >> Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh > >> http://vorpus.org > >> _______________________________________________ > >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list > >> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion