This id good for Numpyists but this will be another operator that good also
help in another contexts.

As a math user, I was first very skeptical but finally this is a good news
for non Numpyists too.

Christophe BAL
Le 15 mars 2014 02:01, "Frédéric Bastien" <no...@nouiz.org> a écrit :

> This is great news. Excellent work Nathaniel and all others!
>
> Frédéric
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Aron Ahmadia <a...@ahmadia.net> wrote:
> > That's the best news I've had all week.
> >
> > Thanks for all your work on this Nathan.
> >
> > -A
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Well, that was fast. Guido says he'll accept the addition of '@' as an
> >> infix operator for matrix multiplication, once some details are ironed
> >> out:
> >>   https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-March/027109.html
> >>   http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0465/
> >>
> >> Specifically, we need to figure out whether we want to make an
> >> argument for a matrix power operator ("@@"), and what
> >> precedence/associativity we want '@' to have. I'll post two separate
> >> threads to get feedback on those in an organized way -- this is just a
> >> heads-up.
> >>
> >> -n
> >>
> >> --
> >> Nathaniel J. Smith
> >> Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh
> >> http://vorpus.org
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> >> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to