On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:22 PM, David Cournapeau <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Charles R Harris < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:01 PM, David Cournapeau <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On my machine, if I use inspect instead of _inspect in >>> numpy.compat.__init__, the import time increases ~ 25 % (from 82 ms to 99 >>> ms). >>> >>> So the hack certainly still make sense, one just need to fix whatever >>> needs fixing (I am still not sure what's broken for the very specific >>> usecase that code was bundled for). >>> >>> >> I'm not sure a one time hit of 17 ms is worth fighting for ;) The >> problems were that both the `string` and `dis` modules were used without >> importing them. >> > > Don't fix what ain't broken ;) > > The 17 ms is not what matters, the % is. People regularly complain about > import times, and 25 % increase in import time is significant (the above > timing are on my new macbook with SSD and 16 Gb RAM -- figures will easily > be 1 order of magnitude worse in common situations with slower computers, > slower HDD, NFS, etc...) > Be interesting to compare times. Could you send along the code you used? My machine is similar except it is a desktop with 2 SSDs in raid 0. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
