On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:22 AM, David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm just building numpy 1.9.2 for Python 3.5 (just released). > >> > >> In order to get the tests to pass on Python 3.5, I need to cherry pick > >> commit 7d6aa8c onto the 1.9.2 tag position. > >> > >> Does anyone object to me uploading a wheel built from this patched > >> version to pypi as 1.9.2 for Python 3.5 on OSX? It would help to get > >> the ball rolling for Python 3.5 binary wheels. > > > > > > Why not releasing this as 1.9.3 ? It does not need to be a full release > > (with binaries and all), but having multiple sources for a given tag is > > confusing. > > Generally OK with me, but it's quite a bit of extra work for very > little gain. We'd have to tag, release a source tarball and OSX > wheels, at least.
I think it's highly desirable that we also have a *source* release that builds on Python 3.5, irrespective of whether or not we have binary wheels for a couple of platforms up for Python 3.5. So I would encourage a quick 1.9.3 release that incorporates this patch. -- Robert Kern
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion