I would like to add patches for the mingwpy windows build as well. There is no Python-3.5 build so far.
Carlkl 2015-09-14 10:46 GMT+02:00 Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:22 AM, David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Brett < > matthew.br...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I'm just building numpy 1.9.2 for Python 3.5 (just released). > > >> > > >> In order to get the tests to pass on Python 3.5, I need to cherry pick > > >> commit 7d6aa8c onto the 1.9.2 tag position. > > >> > > >> Does anyone object to me uploading a wheel built from this patched > > >> version to pypi as 1.9.2 for Python 3.5 on OSX? It would help to get > > >> the ball rolling for Python 3.5 binary wheels. > > > > > > > > > Why not releasing this as 1.9.3 ? It does not need to be a full release > > > (with binaries and all), but having multiple sources for a given tag is > > > confusing. > > > > Generally OK with me, but it's quite a bit of extra work for very > > little gain. We'd have to tag, release a source tarball and OSX > > wheels, at least. > > I think it's highly desirable that we also have a *source* release that > builds on Python 3.5, irrespective of whether or not we have binary wheels > for a couple of platforms up for Python 3.5. So I would encourage a quick > 1.9.3 release that incorporates this patch. > > -- > Robert Kern > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
