On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Fernando Perez <fperez....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > >> > >> I see a severe reaction to perceived 'suspicion and innuendo', but I > >> see no 'suspicion and innuendo'. Unless you mean that any suggestion > >> of potential conflict of interest is suspicion and innuendo. > > > > > > No, as I said, COIs are absolutely a fact of life, and *should* be talked > > about, openly and directly. I was referring generically about the tone > of > > this thread, that Ryan described as "bizarre", others as "surpised", > > "disheartened", etc. > > Sure, I said above, it is clearly true the some people reacted very > strongly. > > Did you see any remark made by me or Stefan or anyone else that could > reasonably be described as bizarre, surprising or disheartening? > Stephan and Matthew, go to your rooms ;) Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
