On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz <jfoxrabinov...@gmail.com> wrote: > P.S. I would like to turn `sinc` into a `ufunc` at some point if the > community approves. It would make the computation much cleaner (e.g., > in-place `where`) and faster. It would also complement the existing > trig functions nicely. The only question I have is whether or not it > is possible to pass in optional parameters to ufuncs beyond the ones > listed in > http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.10.0/reference/ufuncs.html#optional-keyword-arguments
Right now it isn't possible, no. There are a lot of general improvements we can/should make to ufuncs, and this is one of them... -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
