On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Jaime Fernández del Río < jaime.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since we are at it, should quadratic/bilinear forms get their own function > too? That is, after all, what the OP was asking for. > If we have matvecmul and vecmul, then how to implement bilinear forms efficiently becomes pretty clear: np.vecmul(b, np.matvecmul(A, b)) I'm not sure writing a dedicated function in numpy itself makes sense for something this easy. I suppose there would be some performance gains from not saving the immediate result, but I suspect this would be premature optimization in most cases.
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
