I wouldn't have the keyword be "where", as that collides with the notion of
"where" elsewhere in numpy.

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz <
jfoxrabinov...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I still think this function is useful. I have made a change so that it
> only accepts one array, as Marten suggested, making the API much
> cleaner than that of its siblings. The side on which the new
> dimensions will be added is configurable via the `where` parameter,
> which currently accepts 'before' and 'after', but can be changed to
> accept sequences or even dicts. The change also resulted in finding a
> bug in the masked array versions of the atleast functions, which the
> PR now fixes and adds regression tests for. If the devs do decide to
> discard this PR, I will of course submit the bug fix separately.
>
>     -Joe
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Stephan Hoyer <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't know how typical I am in this. But it does make me wonder if the
> >> atleast_* functions act as an attractive nuisance, where new users take
> >> their presence as an implicit recommendation that they are actually a
> useful
> >> thing to reach for, even though they... aren't that. And maybe we
> should be
> >> recommending folk move away from them rather than trying to extend them
> >> further?
> >
> > Agreed. I would avoid adding atleast_nd. We could discourage using
> > atleast_3d (certainly the behavior is indeed surprising), but I'm not
> sure
> > it's worth the trouble.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to