x

On 16 July 2013 16:52, Gil Shotan <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi Ian,
>
>  Thanks for the note. I agree with you that its important. I am not
> focusing on it at this point since it's not currently used by us here at
> Grok. Once I finish restructuring the functionality we are using, I can
> assess how difficult it would be to implement cloning/weight sharing and we
> can continue this discussion. How does that sound?
>
>  David Ragazzi – if you're following this thread – Once I am finished
> with the python implementation of the restructured spatial pooler I plan on
> writing a pure C++ version. So you might want to hang on a few weeks before
> writing one yourself!
>
>  Gil.
>
>   From: Ian Danforth <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 12:38 PM
> To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] Restructuring Spatial Pooler
>
>   Gil,
>
>   A very cool project. Regarding the cloned region, I think this one is
> actually pretty important. Weight sharing is more common than not in
> convolutional nets, and having an explicit class that looks more like this
> strategy will make it easier and more accessible for other researchers to
> work with. If your implementation looks enough like weight sharing, then
> perhaps it should be called 'shared weight region' to make it obvious CLA
> is paying attention to and participating in mainstream research. If, on the
> other hand, it doesn't end up looking at all like weight sharing then
> Subutai is probably right in that it can wait.
>
>  Ian
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to