x
On 16 July 2013 16:52, Gil Shotan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ian, > > Thanks for the note. I agree with you that its important. I am not > focusing on it at this point since it's not currently used by us here at > Grok. Once I finish restructuring the functionality we are using, I can > assess how difficult it would be to implement cloning/weight sharing and we > can continue this discussion. How does that sound? > > David Ragazzi – if you're following this thread – Once I am finished > with the python implementation of the restructured spatial pooler I plan on > writing a pure C++ version. So you might want to hang on a few weeks before > writing one yourself! > > Gil. > > From: Ian Danforth <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 12:38 PM > To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] Restructuring Spatial Pooler > > Gil, > > A very cool project. Regarding the cloned region, I think this one is > actually pretty important. Weight sharing is more common than not in > convolutional nets, and having an explicit class that looks more like this > strategy will make it easier and more accessible for other researchers to > work with. If your implementation looks enough like weight sharing, then > perhaps it should be called 'shared weight region' to make it obvious CLA > is paying attention to and participating in mainstream research. If, on the > other hand, it doesn't end up looking at all like weight sharing then > Subutai is probably right in that it can wait. > > Ian > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > >
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
