Hey everyone -

I got involved with NuPIC with starry eyes after reading the CLA
whitepaper. The abstractions that it describes are exciting and the level
of work that was obvious in the codebase were very compelling. I was mildly
concerned that there were no results presented, but I was told that was
because there are no established metrics for measuring its performance
since it's so novel.

Now, after mucking around in the network engine codebase for a while, I've
realized that the abstractions presented in the CLA whitepaper seem to have
little bearing on the implementation. Spatial and temporal pooling are
accomplished as separate types of regions, which are composed not of cells
but of Nodes, which are themselves comprised of elements...?

This confusion has left me wondering why I believe in this project if
neither theory nor results back up the implementation. This line of
thinking has left me frustrated that I can't find a single result of NuPIC
actually *doing* anything. When none of the existing benchmarks are
fitting, researchers invent a new one. I realize I've seen no learning
curves, no applications to real data, no demonstrations of performance of
any kind.

My hope is that this will provoke a flood of links and papers that I
missed. My fear is that I've been terribly naive to assume that NuPIC would
work when there aren't results out front and center.

Thanks.
Neal Donnelly
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to