Neal,

 Which application domain are you most interested in? Remember that NuPIC
has been used almost exclusively internally by Grok/Numenta until very
recently, and so on a limited set of tasks around prediction and anomaly
detection the technology are much more mature. In most other areas there
haven't been more than tech demos implemented. The kind of extensive use,
methodology and rigor it sounds like you're looking for probably won't
happen until the code base is a bit cleaner and easier to use. It would be
useful to know what you expected NuPIC to be 'doing' so the community can
provide entry points and demonstrations that serve the audience you
represent.

Ian


On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Neal Donnelly <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey everyone -
>
> I got involved with NuPIC with starry eyes after reading the CLA
> whitepaper. The abstractions that it describes are exciting and the level
> of work that was obvious in the codebase were very compelling. I was mildly
> concerned that there were no results presented, but I was told that was
> because there are no established metrics for measuring its performance
> since it's so novel.
>
> Now, after mucking around in the network engine codebase for a while, I've
> realized that the abstractions presented in the CLA whitepaper seem to have
> little bearing on the implementation. Spatial and temporal pooling are
> accomplished as separate types of regions, which are composed not of cells
> but of Nodes, which are themselves comprised of elements...?
>
> This confusion has left me wondering why I believe in this project if
> neither theory nor results back up the implementation. This line of
> thinking has left me frustrated that I can't find a single result of NuPIC
> actually *doing* anything. When none of the existing benchmarks are
> fitting, researchers invent a new one. I realize I've seen no learning
> curves, no applications to real data, no demonstrations of performance of
> any kind.
>
> My hope is that this will provoke a flood of links and papers that I
> missed. My fear is that I've been terribly naive to assume that NuPIC would
> work when there aren't results out front and center.
>
> Thanks.
> Neal Donnelly
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to