On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Matt Keith <[email protected]> wrote:
> 1. I would vote for separate repos for each language binding. This would > allow a user to just get the core and the code they need for their project > without getting bogged down in code churn from work on another binding. > I think you misunderstood the original question. I definitely want different repos for each binding. My question was do we have yet another repo for a client that uses the bindings repo. Should there be: nupic-core <-- python-bindings <-- python-client Or simply: nupic-core <-- python-client (includes bindings) --------- Matt Taylor OS Community Flag-Bearer Numenta
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
