How likely is there going to be a desire for multiple clients for a given binding?
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Matt Keith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 1. I would vote for separate repos for each language binding. This would >> allow a user to just get the core and the code they need for their project >> without getting bogged down in code churn from work on another binding. >> > > I think you misunderstood the original question. I definitely want > different repos for each binding. My question was do we have yet another > repo for a client that uses the bindings repo. > > Should there be: > > nupic-core <-- python-bindings <-- python-client > > Or simply: > > nupic-core <-- python-client (includes bindings) > > > --------- > Matt Taylor > OS Community Flag-Bearer > Numenta > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > >
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
