Hi Fergal, Thanks for your response.
Regarding the first question: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Fergal Byrne <[email protected]>wrote: > > There was no previous design for Temporal Pooling in the theory. There is > a bit of the algorithm called Temporal Pooler (TP) which is misnamed, it > should be called Sequence Recognition or Sequence Prediction (Jeff uses the > term Sequence Memory so the choice of corrected name is unclear). > If I recall the whitepaper correctly, there was indeed a previous design for Temporal Pooling in the theory. It involved neurons forming connections to previously-active neurons, stretching farther and farther back in time as long as there was a stable sequence to learn. I meant to ask specifically about that idea, compared to the new one Jeff introduced here. Thank you Fergal, for your time in writing up your thoughts. I would also love to hear Jeff's take on it as well. - Chetan
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
