Another reminder that algorithms can be rendered in a variety of mediums.

Interesting though, that one might know everything about the medium in
question yet still know relatively little about the algorithms it
implements. You could imagine a chemist studying for years all of the
different species involved in this system and still drawing a blank as to
what it is exactly that the system does. I wonder if neuroscience isn't in
a similar rut when it comes to the brain.

I think a lot of people have the idea that the holy grail of neuroscience
would be to have a single-neuron resolution brain imaging technology that
could be used to track signal processing within the brain from the moment
light hits the retina all the way to behavioral output/long-term memory
storage/what have you. But where does such a technology actually put us as
far as understanding how the brain works?

I read an interesting paper about imaging the neurocircuitry of classical
conditioning in Zebrafish[1], but was surprised at how seemingly little
actionable information there was from an engineering point of view, despite
the group's managing to precisely track learning to a relatively small
cluster of neurons. The techniques used in the study are very interesting
and it's definitely worth the read, but I wonder how long it will be till
such research produces ideas for the data structures and algorithms
actually used within the brain, rather than notions of approximately where
and how learning takes place.

My concerns are probably overblown due to lack of familiarity with the
literature, but it seems like some groups in neuroscience forget Feynman's
adage that what one cannot build, one does not understand.

[1]
http://download.cell.com/neuron/pdf/PIIS0896627313003115.pdf?intermediate=true


On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Fergal Byrne <[email protected]>wrote:

> +1 Jeff. It's taken half a billion years to evolve the machinery to turn
> chemical reactions into intelligence, and we're only starting to figure it
> out in the last few decades.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Jeff Hawkins <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> This is pretty cool.  However, I don't think this will be a practical way
>> to
>> implement HTMs.  The mechanisms for HTM require many steps of processing
>> and
>> much of it is locally specific, e.g. each dendrite segment.  I don't see
>> how
>> this could be done with chemical gradients.  Would love to be proved
>> wrong.
>> Jeff
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nupic [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris
>> Jernigan
>> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 4:08 PM
>> To: NuPIC general mailing list.
>> Subject: Re: [nupic-discuss] Intelligent Chemicals
>>
>> I forgot to ask, do you think this could be used to implement an efficient
>> HTM?
>>
>> On Feb 6, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Chris Jernigan
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > They are doing some really cool research at Harvard on using chemical
>> reactions to create intelligent systems. Here is the article:
>> http://www.seas.harvard.edu/news/2013/12/programming-smart-molecules
>> >
>> > And a PDF of the original paper here:
>>
>> http://papers.nips.cc/paper/4901-message-passing-inference-with-chemical-rea
>> ction-networks.pdf<http://papers.nips.cc/paper/4901-message-passing-inference-with-chemical-reaction-networks.pdf>
>> >
>> > Most of the math is way beyond me, but the concept seems solid enough.
>> What do you guys think?
>> >
>> > -Chris
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nupic mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nupic mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Fergal Byrne, Brenter IT
>
> <http://www.examsupport.ie>http://inbits.com - Better Living through
> Thoughtful Technology
>
> e:[email protected] t:+353 83 4214179
> Formerly of Adnet [email protected] http://www.adnet.ie
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to