Hi Rik, >What kind of scientist, from what discipline, would you consider your 'peer' for purposes of review? A biologist? A computer scientist? HTM research is interdisciplinary research involving biology, computer science and possibly more, and in my local university around the corner I wouldn't know who would consider it to be "their department".
Although your question is for me, I think the more appropriate would be: - Cognitive Neuroscience: HTM (only the theory) - Computational Neuroscience: CLA algorithms itself These are well known in academy. Best, David On 20 February 2014 10:39, Rik <[email protected]> wrote: > Jeff, > > Regarding "publishing in peer-reviewed journals" for the purpose of > getting recognition in academic circles, I remember the papers Sequence > memory for prediction, inference and > behaviour<http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/364/1521/1203.short>and > Towards > a mathematical theory of cortical > micro-circuits<http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000532.g016>. > They're in peer-reviewed journals and have netted 100+ citations according > to Google Scholar. Did these publications gain you some of the recognition > you were hoping for at the time? Would you publish there again? > > Also, let's assume a paper along the lines of the CLA whitepaper were to > be published in a journal. What kind of scientist, from what discipline, > would you consider your 'peer' for purposes of review? A biologist? A > computer scientist? HTM research is interdisciplinary research involving > biology, computer science and possibly more, and in my local university > around the corner I wouldn't know who would consider it to be "their > department". > > Rik > > > On 29/01/14 05:43, Jeff Hawkins wrote: > > Mateja, > > I think I said "publishing in peer reviewed journals" not "publishing at > conferences". Although we could do the latter I have been mostly thinking > about peer reviewed journals and not about conference proceedings. I am > still noodling over how best to do this. If you had any suggestionsI would > appreciate hearing them. We could focus on the neuroscience, the practical > implementations, machine learning, etc. There are many different journals > and different topics we could focus on. I am trying to sort through the > options. > > Jeff > > > > > > *From:* nupic > [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > *On Behalf Of *Mateja Putic > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:27 AM > *To:* NuPIC general mailing list. > *Subject:* [nupic-discuss] Conferences for HTM > > > > During the 2014 planning meeting Jeff said that he's interested in > documentation and pursuing publishing at conferences. I am very interested > in following this effort. > > Do you know what conferences you might be targetting this year? > > Thanks, > > > -- > > Mr. Mateja Putic > > Graduate Research Assistant > > Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering > > University of Virginia > > (703) 303-2099 > > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing > [email protected]http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > >
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
