*Although your question is NOT for me Sorry for spamming the list..
On 20 February 2014 11:23, David Ragazzi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rik, > > >What kind of scientist, from what discipline, would you consider your > 'peer' for purposes of review? A biologist? A computer scientist? HTM > research is interdisciplinary research involving biology, computer science > and possibly more, and in my local university around the corner I wouldn't > know who would consider it to be "their department". > > > Although your question is for me, I think the more appropriate would be: > > - Cognitive Neuroscience: HTM (only the theory) > - Computational Neuroscience: CLA algorithms itself > > These are well known in academy. > > Best, David > > > On 20 February 2014 10:39, Rik <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Jeff, >> >> Regarding "publishing in peer-reviewed journals" for the purpose of >> getting recognition in academic circles, I remember the papers Sequence >> memory for prediction, inference and >> behaviour<http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/364/1521/1203.short>and >> Towards >> a mathematical theory of cortical >> micro-circuits<http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000532.g016>. >> They're in peer-reviewed journals and have netted 100+ citations according >> to Google Scholar. Did these publications gain you some of the recognition >> you were hoping for at the time? Would you publish there again? >> >> Also, let's assume a paper along the lines of the CLA whitepaper were to >> be published in a journal. What kind of scientist, from what discipline, >> would you consider your 'peer' for purposes of review? A biologist? A >> computer scientist? HTM research is interdisciplinary research involving >> biology, computer science and possibly more, and in my local university >> around the corner I wouldn't know who would consider it to be "their >> department". >> >> Rik >> >> >> On 29/01/14 05:43, Jeff Hawkins wrote: >> >> Mateja, >> >> I think I said "publishing in peer reviewed journals" not "publishing at >> conferences". Although we could do the latter I have been mostly thinking >> about peer reviewed journals and not about conference proceedings. I am >> still noodling over how best to do this. If you had any suggestionsI would >> appreciate hearing them. We could focus on the neuroscience, the practical >> implementations, machine learning, etc. There are many different journals >> and different topics we could focus on. I am trying to sort through the >> options. >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* nupic >> [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] >> *On Behalf Of *Mateja Putic >> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:27 AM >> *To:* NuPIC general mailing list. >> *Subject:* [nupic-discuss] Conferences for HTM >> >> >> >> During the 2014 planning meeting Jeff said that he's interested in >> documentation and pursuing publishing at conferences. I am very interested >> in following this effort. >> >> Do you know what conferences you might be targetting this year? >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> -- >> >> Mr. Mateja Putic >> >> Graduate Research Assistant >> >> Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering >> >> University of Virginia >> >> (703) 303-2099 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nupic mailing >> [email protected]http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nupic mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> >
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
