Thanks, Ritchie! I'm glad the issue was discovered and hopefully we will have a fix in soon. I am definitely having a hard time keeping up with NuPIC emails and PR comment flow. There's a lot of great activity going on.
--Subutai On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Ritchie Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Subutai, > > Not sure if you made it to the bottom of my last (big long) post. > Eventually I found that CLA does work properly in this case. For some > reason, the anomaly score was returned as "nan" and that threw off the > plotting. I sent my files to Matt for forensics as he requested. > Explicitly searching and replacing nan's with 1.0's made my plots look much > better. > > Cheers, > > Ritchie > > >> Message: 1 >> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:10:33 -0700 >> From: Subutai Ahmad <[email protected]> >> To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [nupic-discuss] Noisy step example >> Message-ID: >> < >> ca+zatih1krt3khyyhk5pgkp_rnpnxtg6s+g9qif7q98-0h3...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> My guess would be the same as Marek's. Or perhaps some other parameter >> differences. I'm not sure why the anomaly score doesn't spike at the jump >> in your test. We see this type of transition all the time in Grok and it >> seems to work well. In Grok we do have learning on always - I don't know >> if >> that could be a difference. >> --Subutai > > > Ritchie Lee > Research Engineer > Carnegie Mellon University-Silicon Valley > NASA Ames Research Center > Bldg 19, Rm 1024 > Moffett Field, CA 94035 > (650) 335-2847 > > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > >
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
