Hello,
I'm at UWA in Perth.
On May 5, 2014 10:51 AM, "Adam Kneller" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I'm based at Griffith University on the Gold Coast.
>
>
> On 29 April 2014 17:08, Subutai Ahmad <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks, Ritchie!  I'm glad the issue was discovered and hopefully we will
>> have a fix in soon. I am definitely having a hard time keeping up with
>> NuPIC emails and PR comment flow. There's a lot of great activity going on.
>>
>> --Subutai
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Ritchie Lee <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Subutai,
>>>
>>> Not sure if you made it to the bottom of my last (big long) post.
>>>  Eventually I found that CLA does work properly in this case.  For some
>>> reason, the anomaly score was returned as "nan" and that threw off the
>>> plotting.  I sent my files to Matt for forensics as he requested.
>>> Explicitly searching and replacing nan's with 1.0's made my plots look much
>>> better.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ritchie
>>>
>>>
>>>> Message: 1
>>>> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:10:33 -0700
>>>> From: Subutai Ahmad <[email protected]>
>>>> To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: [nupic-discuss] Noisy step example
>>>> Message-ID:
>>>>         <
>>>> ca+zatih1krt3khyyhk5pgkp_rnpnxtg6s+g9qif7q98-0h3...@mail.gmail.com>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>> My guess would be the same as Marek's. Or perhaps some other parameter
>>>> differences. I'm not sure why the anomaly score doesn't spike at the
>>>> jump
>>>> in your test. We see this type of transition all the time in Grok and it
>>>> seems to work well. In Grok we do have learning on always - I don't
>>>> know if
>>>> that could be a difference.
>>>> --Subutai
>>>
>>>
>>> Ritchie Lee
>>> Research Engineer
>>> Carnegie Mellon University-Silicon Valley
>>> NASA Ames Research Center
>>> Bldg 19, Rm 1024
>>> Moffett Field, CA 94035
>>> (650) 335-2847
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nupic mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nupic mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to