I'm guessing it's a different team since Winfried is not on their Science paper http://www.sciencemag.org/content/345/6197/668.abstract nor is he in the photograph in the article you linked to. In addition to that their computer uses spikes for inputs and outputs and Winfried has been a skeptic of that approach in the past, I believe it was in one of the videos from the conference at Sandia this spring that I heard him voice this opinion. If that's true then IBM has at least two teams working on this which is great.
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Erik Blas <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder if Winfried is working with this team? > http://www.research.ibm.com/articles/brain-chip.shtml > > Programming language for the architecture: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/91714474/Papers/020.IJCNN2013.Corelet.pdf > > I'm excited to see the idea of using a collection of prediction cores as > primitives to build with, an idea I've bantered around with some (though > I've been fixated on the primitive being an abstraction for brookes modules > informed by nupic predictions and the inputs passed into the models for said > predictions). Exciting times are ahead! > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > -- James Bridgewater, PhD Arizona State University 480-227-9592 _______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
