^__^



On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Jim Bridgewater <[email protected]> wrote:

> As someone who has read a lot of academic papers I can say with full
> confidence that none of them are worth $20.
>
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 2:58 AM, cogmission1 .
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Is it worth the $20 to read the article? Is the chip something that could
> > host a CLA?
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> This project is not associated with Winfried's team or HTM.
> >>
> >> Sent from my MegaPhone
> >>
> >> On Aug 9, 2014, at 7:44 PM, "cogmission1 ." <[email protected]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Why is there no mention of Numenta? Is the algorithmic processing on
> board
> >> the chip not related to HTMs at all?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Jim Bridgewater <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm guessing it's a different team since Winfried is not on their
> >>> Science paper http://www.sciencemag.org/content/345/6197/668.abstract
> >>> nor is he in the photograph in the article you linked to.  In addition
> >>> to that their computer uses spikes for inputs and outputs and Winfried
> >>> has been a skeptic of that approach in the past, I believe it was in
> >>> one of the videos from the conference at Sandia this spring that I
> >>> heard him voice this opinion.  If that's true then IBM has at least
> >>> two teams working on this which is great.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Erik Blas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> > I wonder if Winfried is working with this team?
> >>> > http://www.research.ibm.com/articles/brain-chip.shtml
> >>> >
> >>> > Programming language for the architecture:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/91714474/Papers/020.IJCNN2013.Corelet.pdf
> >>> >
> >>> > I'm excited to see the idea of using a collection of prediction cores
> >>> > as
> >>> > primitives to build with, an idea I've bantered around with some
> >>> > (though
> >>> > I've been fixated on the primitive being an abstraction for brookes
> >>> > modules
> >>> > informed by nupic predictions and the inputs passed into the models
> for
> >>> > said
> >>> > predictions). Exciting times are ahead!
> >>> >
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > nupic mailing list
> >>> > [email protected]
> >>> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> James Bridgewater, PhD
> >>> Arizona State University
> >>> 480-227-9592
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> nupic mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nupic mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nupic mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nupic mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> James Bridgewater, PhD
> Arizona State University
> 480-227-9592
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to