Seems taht link is broken.
2014-08-26 23:09 GMT+04:30 Matthew Taylor <[email protected]>: > Hello NuPIC, > > We have been wondering at Numenta whether it is possible to be even > more open about our algorithm research. Here is a proposal, and I'd > like to know what you think. > > We could, in an effort to be more transparent with ongoing prototypes > and experiments with algorithm implementations, publish this work in a > public repository at https://github.com/numenta/nupic.research. This > would be temporary experimental code, which poses some challenges. > This would mean: > > - it can change without warning or explanation > - it will change quickly as experiments are discarded and recreated > - it might not change at all for a while > - it could just be plain wrong or buggy for periods of time > - code will not be production-quality > - comments and questions about this code may be ignored > - Numenta is under no obligation to properly document or explain this > codebase or follow any understandable process > - repository will be read-only > > We want to be as transparent as possible, but we also want to move > fast with these experiments so the finalized algorithms can be > included into NuPIC as soon as they are ready. Would a public > repository like this benefit the NuPIC community? Or create confusion > about what's coming next? > > --------- > Matt Taylor > OS Community Flag-Bearer > Numenta > > PS: A copy of this message was send to nupic-discuss and nupic-theory. > You may safely respond to either message to send back to the > respective list. I'll be monitoring both threads, so either one is > fine. > > > -- Best Regards. S.M. Mohammadzadeh *Web: www.mohammadzadeh.info <http://www.mohammadzadeh.info>* *Blog: blog.mohammadzadeh.info <http://blog.mohammadzadeh.info/>* * softnhard ==> software and hardware expert
