Sounds good. While I have the TemporalMemory implemented I still am going to revisit it to flush out some concepts I started working on for the SpatialPooler that I want to re-implement in the TM. So, I'm not ready quite yet to collaborate but I like the idea.
Let's take this to a new discussion though ok? Cheers, David (Ray) On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:03 AM, David Ragazzi <[email protected]> wrote: > Mr. Ray, your Java version could serve as good base and starting point for > implement a OO version in Python. If you wish, we could work together on > that. > > > On 27 August 2014 12:53, cogmission1 . <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I like the Labs = archived experiments, Incubator = current approved >> experiments idea... That sounds interesting? >> >> David >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:49 AM, David Ragazzi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I support this idea but with one condition: >>> -> If we move stable pieces of research to a specific folder. I mean >>> that SP and TP that are working fine could be in a separated folder as >>> occurs in Nupic.Core. In this case, we would put Python CLA that is ok into >>> nupic/engine folder. This is how the code is organized in Nupic.Core. Or >>> better, create an python OO version of CLA into nupic/engine, so peeople >>> wouldn't concern about understand nupic/research in case of they which have >>> fun with CLA instantaneously. >>> >>> So if new changes in nupic/research bring proved improvements to NuPIC, >>> we update the algorithms in nupic/engine. This way we keep the things well >>> organized. >>> >>> >>> On 27 August 2014 09:22, Seyyed Mohammad mohammadzadeh < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Seems taht link is broken. >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-08-26 23:09 GMT+04:30 Matthew Taylor <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Hello NuPIC, >>>>> >>>>> We have been wondering at Numenta whether it is possible to be even >>>>> more open about our algorithm research. Here is a proposal, and I'd >>>>> like to know what you think. >>>>> >>>>> We could, in an effort to be more transparent with ongoing prototypes >>>>> and experiments with algorithm implementations, publish this work in a >>>>> public repository at https://github.com/numenta/nupic.research. This >>>>> would be temporary experimental code, which poses some challenges. >>>>> This would mean: >>>>> >>>>> - it can change without warning or explanation >>>>> - it will change quickly as experiments are discarded and recreated >>>>> - it might not change at all for a while >>>>> - it could just be plain wrong or buggy for periods of time >>>>> - code will not be production-quality >>>>> - comments and questions about this code may be ignored >>>>> - Numenta is under no obligation to properly document or explain this >>>>> codebase or follow any understandable process >>>>> - repository will be read-only >>>>> >>>>> We want to be as transparent as possible, but we also want to move >>>>> fast with these experiments so the finalized algorithms can be >>>>> included into NuPIC as soon as they are ready. Would a public >>>>> repository like this benefit the NuPIC community? Or create confusion >>>>> about what's coming next? >>>>> >>>>> --------- >>>>> Matt Taylor >>>>> OS Community Flag-Bearer >>>>> Numenta >>>>> >>>>> PS: A copy of this message was send to nupic-discuss and nupic-theory. >>>>> You may safely respond to either message to send back to the >>>>> respective list. I'll be monitoring both threads, so either one is >>>>> fine. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best Regards. >>>> S.M. Mohammadzadeh >>>> *Web: www.mohammadzadeh.info <http://www.mohammadzadeh.info>* >>>> *Blog: blog.mohammadzadeh.info <http://blog.mohammadzadeh.info/>* >>>> >>>> * softnhard ==> software and hardware expert >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> David Ragazzi >>> MSc in Sofware Engineer (University of Liverpool) >>> OS Community Commiter at Numenta.org >>> -- >>> "I think James Connolly, the Irish revolutionary, is right when he says that >>> the only prophets are those who make their future. So we're not >>> anticipating, we're working for it." >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > David Ragazzi > MSc in Sofware Engineer (University of Liverpool) > OS Community Commiter at Numenta.org > -- > "I think James Connolly, the Irish revolutionary, is right when he says that > the only prophets are those who make their future. So we're not > anticipating, we're working for it." > > > >
