Sorry we got out of sync, my question regarding the columns representing sparse bits by the inhibition of whole topographies stands... For every input there is a resultant output, so that implies some kind of sync'ing right?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Rich Morin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 5, 2015, at 17:08, cogmission <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... all bits could be processed at once or in chunks equal to the > > number of cores doing the processing (x 2 if you figure in the > > Hyper-Threading in the case of an Intel CPU) > > I'm thinking more in terms of lightweight (Elixir/Erlang) processes as > the "actors", so there could be one for each neuron, column, or region > as desired. This could make maintaining sequentiality more difficult. > > -r > > -- > http://www.cfcl.com/rdm Rich Morin [email protected] > http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume San Bruno, CA, USA +1 650-873-7841 > > Software system design, development, and documentation > > > > -- *We find it hard to hear what another is saying because of how loudly "who one is", speaks...*
