There's no need to develop the page outside of Wikipedia. Just make changes directly to the Wikipedia pages at any time.
Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 6, 2015, at 9:48 AM, cogmission (David Ray) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Simply put, I would like to see the wikipedia listing for Hierarchical > Temporal Memory improved and brought up to date. > > Problems: > The current listing has several inaccuracies regarding the current state of > HTM Theory; does not reflect the historical evolution of the theory; and > instead, superimposes the historical/older version's origins with newer > developments creating a cognitive mishmash of indistinct informational > attributes. > > Solution: > I would like to see the current page/listing accurately describe the events > following the publishing of "On Intelligence"; the formation of Numenta; and > the eventual split between approaches favored by Dileep George, and Jeff > Hawkins. I propose that coverage of Dileep George and his company Vicarious > link to another page that those in that camp can more fully enhance at their > will - and the rest of the listing then proceed to describe the development > of the Cortical Learning Algorithm and the more current focus of Numenta et > al. > > Unknowns: > 1. Is the term "Hierarchical Temporal Memory" currently used by Dileep George > and Vicarious? > > Process: > Once this proposal has been honed such that it reflects a satisfactory > approach and direction; that the current listing text be incrementally and > iteratively modified, then submitted for approval - each submission's > approval representing an interactive improvement of the entire text until > such time as it is considered to be an accurate representation. This entire > process is to proceed "offline" (not posted to wikipedia until finished). > > I propose this iterative approach because it will make things easier > (initially for me specifically, but maybe by a "team" of people who would > like to participate - I encourage this). Advantages: > > 1. the text updates can be made in small increments as knowledge is acquired > seeing as the "implementing team" doesn't possess the whole story. [ Again, > the "implementing team" will be initially composed of myself but is wide open > to other community contributors ;-) ] > > 2. Submissions of small changes won't take much time to "validate" and turn > around time can be more "immediate" leading to a quicker process.This will > consume negligible time on the part of the validator, increasing willingness > and therefore the process' general momentum. > > What does everyone think? > > Regards, > David > > -- > With kind regards, > > David Ray > Java Solutions Architect > > Cortical.io > Sponsor of: HTM.java > > [email protected] > http://cortical.io
