Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev <[email protected]> writes:
> Nearby there's also a `generic_modbus" name. Wondering if the new driver > should be (similar to) `generic_gpio`. sound good. It would be nice if there were an abstraction layer for various GPIO access methods, rather than hard-coding linux, even if there is only one implementation of the abstraction. I'm not that clear on GPIO, but I gather there are differences. Or maybe there is already a portable GPIO abstraction library? > @Community verdict: Then there was also an effort some years ago to name > drivers with a `nutdrv-*` prefix... WDYT? I see nutdrv- when used as a driver name to be conent-free. _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
