2008/4/2, Arjen de Korte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I'm still not too sure if we're doing people a favor with this, but > >> I'll leave it up to you if this is a good thing or not. > > I don't see your point here: having a sorted list gives a clear > > picture to the user. > > > That depends... > > > > while an unsorted list can be disappointing. > > Or have I missed something obvious?! > > > By sorting this list alphabetically, you're removing the possibility to > group commands logically. The 'calibrate.*' and 'test.*' commands are > similar, so it is nice to list them as one group. By sorting commands > alphabetically, the 'load.*' and 'shutdown.*' commands will be put in > between them. This will look different for quite a few drivers. >
right. so the solution might be between, like using the order given in cmdvartab. that allows both sorting and grouping smartly. note that this is just cosmetic, and not urging for 2.2.2... Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - MGE Office Protection Systems - http://www.mgeops.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/ Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
