>> I think that is the best thing to do. So I'll just remove the alarm()
>> mechanism from the clients, since that's become obsolete now that we
>> have non-blocking read/write that provides a much cleaner interface.
> ok
> I'm preparing -pre2. Is it ok for you?

Yes. I found that the only client that is using alarm to break out of
stalled read/write actions is upsmon. Since having alarms doesn't hurt
(they are just redundant now), we can probably leave them in for now. So
go ahead, release -pre2.

Best regards, Arjen


_______________________________________________
Nut-upsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev

Reply via email to