Hi Charles, back from a long week end...
2008/5/12 Charles Lepple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Charles Lepple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > One thing I just noticed with the recent backport of packaging/debian > > from branches/Testing is that we will probably want to keep separate > > versions of packaging/debian for internal testing versus official > > releases. Right now, "debuild -us -uc" from the trunk (rev 1490) > > generates debs with version 2.2.2-1. > > When I checked the contents of the .debs from r1490, I also noticed > the nut-xml .deb package is almost empty - it probably needs another > mv command in debian/rules to add the driver. > > Arnaud: Let me know if you are already working on this. I am. I've just seen this when 2.2.2 was released, and when I started to work on the official debs :-( > In a similar vein, I have been using cdbs at work - it is actually > fairly nice, for the common rule cases. There are some issues with > overriding the default rules - basically, you can't, you just have to > reimplement them - but I don't think that NUT will have much trouble > with the defaults since it uses debhelper now. I've not yet really studied this. If you want to take over on a branch, and check for the feasibility, you're much welcome. arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - MGE Office Protection Systems - http://www.mgeops.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/ Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
