Hi Charles, 2010/3/16 Charles Lepple <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Charles Lepple <[email protected]> wrote: >> Let me know if anyone has a preference on the location of the authors file. >> "tools/" seems to be where we keep things related to the release process, >> rather than scripts and data files used at runtime. >> >> Also, I didn't add any autoconf magic for svn2cl, figuring that it will only >> be used by someone generating a tarball. Other opinions welcome. > > Here's the whole set of changes: > > http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset?new=branches%2Fsvn-auto-changelog%402403&old=branches%2Fsvn-auto-changelog%402401 > > Arjen and Arnaud, when you have some time, could you please take a > look and let me know your thoughts on this? > > At r2403, the code does not force the creation of a ChangeLog if a > user simply checks out the source, then runs autoreconf, configure and > make. I am wondering if we should remove the "|| echo" portion, and > simply add a "touch ChangeLog" on the buildslaves that don't have > svn2cl (and wouldn't need it, since they are not all distributing > tarball snapshots).
nice job. I'm in favor of keeping the failure warning msg, while touching ChangeLog. note that I haven't yet had a chance to test it though. thanks, Arnaud _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
