Citeren Tim Rice <[email protected]>:
There is at least one currently shipping UNIX platform where socklen_t is not defined. Please keep the NUT_TYPE_SOCKLEN_T test.
Which one? Is this system POSIX compliant (and do we fail to provide the proper flags to make it behave like one?)
Nut's m4/nut_type_socklen_t.m4 could be enhanced with the recent changes to gnulib's m4/socklen.m4
I'm not sure this is a good idea. We require POSIX compliance and as far as I know, socklen_t should be defined.
Best regards, Arjen -- Please keep list traffic on the list (off-list replies will be rejected) _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
