On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Arjen de Korte wrote: > Citeren Tim Rice <[email protected]>: > > > There is at least one currently shipping UNIX platform where socklen_t is > > not defined. Please keep the NUT_TYPE_SOCKLEN_T test. > > Which one? Is this system POSIX compliant (and do we fail to provide the > proper flags to make it behave like one?)
Not anything that is currently supported. If I can think of one, there my be others I don't know about. The point is, why pull out a good test just because most current systems define socklen_t? But to answer your question, I was thinking of OpenServer 5. If I remember corretly, none of the UnixWare versions prior to 7.1.4 defined socklen_t. Again not currently supported (and not currently shipping systems). It has been on my TODO list for a while to get NUT working on UnixWare 7.1.4. If I get that done, there will likley be people on 7.1.3 or OpenUNIX 8.0.0 that will want NUT working there too. > > Nut's m4/nut_type_socklen_t.m4 could be enhanced with the recent changes > > to gnulib's m4/socklen.m4 > > I'm not sure this is a good idea. We require POSIX compliance and as far as I > know, socklen_t should be defined. > > Best regards, Arjen -- Tim Rice Multitalents (707) 887-1469 [email protected] _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
