I hadn't caught up with the thread activity
before sending the previous message. Thanks for the consideration.
Bill
At 11:03 AM 2/28/2012, Arnaud Quette wrote:
Hi again Bill,
2012/2/28 William R. Elliot <[email protected]>:
> Arnaud' the original reason for this was due to having multiple
> communication channels to the UPS. It is possible for the non-NUT channel
> to start a UPS delayed shutdown that the NUT master and slaves need to know
> about. Charles suggested using FSD rather than OB LB to avoid confusing
> messages about a low battery in the log when there isn't a low battery.
> Upsmon still does the work, I think, it is just that the driver is setting
> the flag for upsmon to act on rather than upsmon seeing OB LB and doing the
> same thing. Can the rules be adjusted?
indeed, rules can (and must) always be adjusted for good reasons.
I've answered to Charles' mail, and proposed a doc amendment.
cheers,
Arnaud
--
Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
