On Dec 16, 2013, at 5:52 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:

> On 12/16/2013 09:06 AM, Charles Lepple wrote:
>> If you want, we can take a look at the output of the aforementioned udevd
>> command from your system. Please compress the output, and if the list bounces
>> it, I'll extract the relevant portion from the bounce message.
>> 
>> I have a funny feeling we might either have a Debian-specific dependency on
>> 91-permissions.rules, or some other package is masking the NUT udev rule.
>> 
> 
> Charles,
> 
>  I'll be glad to get the information from my box, but we have to get upsd
> running again. See thread: "kernel update to 3.12.5-1, now: upsd[617]:
> getaddrinfo: Servname not supported for ai_socktype". upsd quit working after 
> my
> kernel update today. I have no ideas what the ai_socktype error is, but I've
> seen quite a bit of coding arguments about how to implement it on the web.
> Perhaps the latest kernel makes the way nut does it not work anymore. That's 
> for
> the other thread though...

^ I think this has been addressed, right?

>  If the output from my udev test is large, I'll just post if for download on 
> my
> site and include a link in the email. Thanks again for your help.


Any updates on the udev debug output?

Thanks,

-- 
Charles Lepple
clepple@gmail




_______________________________________________
Nut-upsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev

Reply via email to