On Mar 25, 2015, at 4:11 AM, Arnaud Quette <[email protected]> wrote:
> 1) Keep the legacy CHRG / DISCHRG status bits for ups.status, along with the > complementary ones for battery.charger.status. And advocate (document) for > the use of / switch to the latter, that is more suitable for publishing such > information. All that with an impact on all the NUT driver, and a transition > period to address that cleanly. I prefer this option, for what it's worth. Let's not make ups.status more cluttered. -- Charles Lepple clepple@gmail _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
