Hi Charles, 2015-03-29 0:44 GMT+01:00 Charles Lepple <[email protected]>:
> On Mar 25, 2015, at 4:11 AM, Arnaud Quette <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > 1) Keep the legacy CHRG / DISCHRG status bits for ups.status, along with > the complementary ones for battery.charger.status. And advocate (document) > for the use of / switch to the latter, that is more suitable for publishing > such information. All that with an impact on all the NUT driver, and a > transition period to address that cleanly. > > I prefer this option, for what it's worth. Let's not make ups.status more > cluttered. > so do I. FYI, the patch I committed for ABM use either one or the other. I.e., if ABM support is enabled, status are published on battery.charger.status and CHRG/DISCHRG are not pushed to ups.status. And conversely if ABM is disabled. cheers, Arno -- Eaton Data Center Automation - Opensource Leader NUT (Network UPS Tools) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
