On Mar 25, 2020, at 6:09 PM, Lee Damon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I have no experience with Tripp Lite UPSs and the reviews I've found online 
> are scant and fairly mixed so I thought I'd ask here...

It's always hard to get a good read on whether a particular UPS brand is 
problematic, or if there is more noise on the lists because people are trying 
to make something work. And then there's the subtle differences under the hood.

If I can generalize a bit, I'd say the USB Tripp Lite UPSes we've seen over the 
past 15 years fall into one of three categories:

* "HID" but not PDC HID (Power Device Class): solid hardware, proprietary 
protocol (basically the proprietary Tripp Lite serial protocol converted to USB 
HID reports); some models don't provide all the stats people want.

* PDC HID, but problems at the USB physical layer and/or the OS HCI layer. 
SMART1500LCDT falls into this category. I think this whole series ("protocol 
3016") is problematic, but these USB symptoms seem to be confined to this 
series.

* Other members of the PDC HID product lines, which just seem to quietly work 
(and which have been tested against NUT in Tripp Lite's labs, as David alluded 
to earlier).

Either Eric or David from Tripp Lite mentioned that they are not selling the 
models with proprietary protocols anymore. We won't know if there is another 
problematic piece of hardware like protocol 3016 until people try it (and it 
sometimes depends on the hardware on the host side - for 3016, pre-USB3 
controllers had better luck than USB3 controllers, even on non-superspeed 
ports).

David mentioned your model is likely protocol 4004. Here are other 
compatibility reports with that protocol ID:

* https://networkupstools.org/ddl/Tripp_Lite/SU1000RTXL2UA.html
* https://networkupstools.org/ddl/Tripp_Lite/SU1500RTXL2UA.html
* https://networkupstools.org/ddl/Tripp_Lite/SU1500RTXLCD2U.html
* https://networkupstools.org/ddl/Tripp_Lite/SU1000XLA.html
* https://networkupstools.org/ddl/Tripp_Lite/SU2200XLA.html

Seems like a good choice to me, based on the available information. Of those, 
the 1500s seem to have the most recent information (NUT 2.6.3).

(Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns, IANAL, I don't speak 
for my employer, I don't work for an UPS manufacturer or reseller, I don't own 
any Tripp Lite stock, something about staying at a Holiday Inn, etc.)

-- 
- Charles Lepple
https://ghz.cc/charles/



_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

Reply via email to