On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, at 8:15 PM, Rusty Bower wrote: > I’m not a fan of secondary when there can be multiple secondaries
A secondary is a secondary. There can be multiple secondaries. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 12, 2021, at 18:46, Dan Langille via Nut-upsuser >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, at 6:52 PM, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser wrote: >>> Hello fellow NUTs :) >>> >>> Some time ago an issue https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/840 >>> was raised, and with current work underway to publish a standard on NUT >>> protocol it became more urgent - to retire the master/slave terminology >>> from NUT configuration and documentation. >>> >>> I looked around for suitable synonyms, and for our primary use-case with >>> upsmon roles - where it either manages an UPS by direct link and tells >>> others to shut down ASAP, or is one of such shutdown agents being told what >>> to do, words "manager" and "subordinate" seem neutral enough and reflective >>> of the activities and relationship of these actors. >>> >>> Would native speakers or others better versed in the current dictionary >>> of acceptable words please confirm if this choice is okay, or suggest >>> better alternatives? >> >> What about primary and secondary? >> -- >> Dan Langille >> [email protected] >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nut-upsuser mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser -- Dan Langille [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
