I’m not a fan of secondary when there can be multiple secondaries Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 12, 2021, at 18:46, Dan Langille via Nut-upsuser > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, at 6:52 PM, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser wrote: >> Hello fellow NUTs :) >> >> Some time ago an issue https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/840 >> was raised, and with current work underway to publish a standard on NUT >> protocol it became more urgent - to retire the master/slave terminology from >> NUT configuration and documentation. >> >> I looked around for suitable synonyms, and for our primary use-case with >> upsmon roles - where it either manages an UPS by direct link and tells >> others to shut down ASAP, or is one of such shutdown agents being told what >> to do, words "manager" and "subordinate" seem neutral enough and reflective >> of the activities and relationship of these actors. >> >> Would native speakers or others better versed in the current dictionary of >> acceptable words please confirm if this choice is okay, or suggest better >> alternatives? > > What about primary and secondary? > -- > Dan Langille > [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > Nut-upsuser mailing list > [email protected] > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
