> My proposal is to even when we see product/vendor id, we make > extra sanit(ar)y checks before fixing values just to make > sure cyberpower haven't fixed them in some newer firmware > and we do fix already fixed values
[...] We can't (and won't) reliably do that. The ranges for fixed/unfixed values overlap. If you conditionally adjust values based on the readings, you'd get nasty jumps in the battery voltage, which is even worse from a user perspective than a value that is off by a fixed factor and/or offset. So we either leave the 'unfixed' versions as they are or risk breaking 'fixed' versions of the firmware. As already mentioned, CyberPower doesn't have the best track record in this respect, so I don't think we will fix this in NUT (since there are other models that use the same ProductID that don't have this firmware flaw). Best regards, Arjen _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
