Looking at the configure output, I though nut-cgi was using X11 and glib stuff. I will check.
It looks good other wise. I had to disable hal, powerman and neonxml feature to get it wotk. I still got some with installed but unpackaged file that need some modification in the spec file. I will update soon. Patrick doesn't work anymore on this project but yes indeed we work in the same dept. He contributed a bit to nut project some time ago if I remember well. So I am continuing part of is job now. Antoine _____ De : Arnaud Quette [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : lundi 3 août 2009 16:16 À : Antoine Gatineau Cc : nut-upsuser Objet : Re: [Nut-upsuser] Usbhip-ups going wild just to complete a bit Manuel's answer 2009/8/3 Manuel Wolfshant Antoine Gatineau wrote: Ok, Now I am rebuilding an el4 rpm based on el5 src.rpm. I will remove the --with-hal option in the configure part. In order a full featured rpm, I'm trying to keep every option unless hal. But I am having problems with dependencies. libX11-devel, xorg-x11-devel libXpm-devel, still xorg-x11-devel, if I am not mistaken dbus-glib-devel dbus-devel you can drop this one since it's for the nut-hal package (note that you might need to remove the nut-hal package definitions throughout the .spec...) and powerman-devel not available, afaik IIRC, I had to compile it for RHEL-5, and in turn it required some other packages (a newer curl, for instance) I suggest to drop its usage yup, this part is for the powerman (external PDU) support. just in case you want it: http://sourceforge.net/projects/powerman/files/ btw, are you working with Patrick Agrain? Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ do not exist in RHEL 4... These are for RHEL5. Does anyone know the equivalent dependencies for RHEL4? Another possibility is to disable the option that requires thoses dependencies. I didn't find a document explaining that so could you help. By disabling the troublemaker options, I can build a package for my particuliar configuration. Of course it will not help others... I put the RHEL5 spec file in attachement also. Merci, Antoine ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *De :* Arnaud Quette [mailto:[email protected]] *Envoyé :* lundi 3 août 2009 11:09 *À :* Antoine Gatineau *Cc :* Charles Lepple; nut-upsuser *Objet :* Re: [Nut-upsuser] Usbhip-ups going wild salut Antoine 2009/8/3 Antoine Gatineau <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Thanks for the info. I use the first approach. So, if I understood well, the nut-hal support (ie, the --with-hal) is used only for the 2nd approach. Udev rules are dealt when using --with-usb. Is that correct? mostly! the udev rules are used in both cases... If so, I might be able to rebuild the nut-2.4.1 pachage for RHEL4. For packaging help (I think I might need some for the next stage ;-) ) do I continue this thread or use the nut-packaging list (or both). no, continue using the present thread. nut-packaging is not really active, and I've created it originally as a placeholder for packagers discussions (related to the NUT Packaging Standard - NPS - topic) cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *De :* Arnaud Quette [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] *Envoyé :* vendredi 31 juillet 2009 21:41 *À :* Antoine Gatineau *Cc :* Charles Lepple; nut-upsuser *Objet :* Re: [Nut-upsuser] Usbhip-ups going wild salut Antoine, 2009/7/31 Antoine Gatineau <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> I might ask a stupid question but isn't hal used to manage the UPS device and connection through udev rules? I though that hal was mostly usefull with usb... In the nut-hal document, it is said that HAL "allows NUT drivers to feed the HAL system, which will itself feeds applications such as the Gnome Power Manager" Does that mean hal is not used for managing the battery itself but sees the nut driver as a "pseudo real battery"? In this case, indeed, I do not need it. I use upsmon for power management. not at all. there are 2 approaches: - the standard one, where you have a driver (usbhid-ups), upsd and upsmon. udev only applies the device privileges rules. - the Integrated Power Management approach, where NUT USB driver can feed data to HAL (instead of upsd), replacing the basic USB/HID support in HAL. Note that HAL is being superseded by DeviceKit and DeviceKit-power. This approach will probably be abandonned... -----Message d'origine----- De : Charles Lepple [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] Envoyé : vendredi 31 juillet 2009 15:08 À : Antoine Gatineau Cc : 'nut-upsuser' Objet : Re: [Nut-upsuser] Usbhip-ups going wild On Jul 31, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Antoine Gatineau wrote: > Indeed, nut depends on some packages not the distribution itself. > You are surely right. > > Anyway, here are the links : > RHEL 4 : ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/EPEL/4ES/SRPMS/ > nut-2.2.0-4.el4.src.rpm > RHEL 5 : nut-2.4.1 found only on this one > http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/nut/SRPM/ use that one. install it and edit the spec. modifying --with-all by --with-usb should be sufficient. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
