just to complete a bit Manuel's answer 2009/8/3 Manuel Wolfshant
> Antoine Gatineau wrote: > >> Ok, >> Now I am rebuilding an el4 rpm based on el5 src.rpm. >> I will remove the --with-hal option in the configure part. In order a >> full featured rpm, I'm trying to keep every option unless hal. >> But I am having problems with dependencies. libX11-devel, >> > xorg-x11-devel > > libXpm-devel, >> > still xorg-x11-devel, if I am not mistaken > > dbus-glib-devel >> > dbus-devel > you can drop this one since it's for the nut-hal package (note that you might need to remove the nut-hal package definitions throughout the .spec...) > and powerman-devel >> > not available, afaik > IIRC, I had to compile it for RHEL-5, and in turn it required some other > packages (a newer curl, for instance) > I suggest to drop its usage > yup, this part is for the powerman (external PDU) support. just in case you want it: http://sourceforge.net/projects/powerman/files/ btw, are you working with Patrick Agrain? Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ > > do not exist in RHEL 4... These are for RHEL5. >> Does anyone know the equivalent dependencies for RHEL4? >> Another possibility is to disable the option that requires thoses >> dependencies. I didn't find a document explaining that so could you help. >> By disabling the troublemaker options, I can build a package for my >> particuliar configuration. Of course it will not help others... >> I put the RHEL5 spec file in attachement also. >> Merci, >> Antoine >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *De :* Arnaud Quette [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Envoyé :* lundi 3 août 2009 11:09 >> *À :* Antoine Gatineau >> *Cc :* Charles Lepple; nut-upsuser >> *Objet :* Re: [Nut-upsuser] Usbhip-ups going wild >> >> salut Antoine >> >> 2009/8/3 Antoine Gatineau <[email protected] <mailto: >> [email protected]>> >> >> >> Thanks for the info. >> I use the first approach. >> So, if I understood well, the nut-hal support (ie, the --with-hal) >> is used only for the 2nd approach. Udev rules are dealt when using >> --with-usb. >> Is that correct? >> >> >> mostly! the udev rules are used in both cases... >> >> If so, I might be able to rebuild the nut-2.4.1 pachage for RHEL4. >> For packaging help (I think I might need some for the next stage >> ;-) ) do I continue this thread or use the nut-packaging list (or >> both). >> >> >> no, continue using the present thread. >> nut-packaging is not really active, and I've created it originally as a >> placeholder for packagers discussions (related to the NUT Packaging Standard >> - NPS - topic) >> >> cheers, >> Arnaud >> -- >> Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops >> Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ >> Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org >> Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *De :* Arnaud Quette [mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>] >> *Envoyé :* vendredi 31 juillet 2009 21:41 >> *À :* Antoine Gatineau >> *Cc :* Charles Lepple; nut-upsuser >> >> *Objet :* Re: [Nut-upsuser] Usbhip-ups going wild >> >> salut Antoine, >> >> 2009/7/31 Antoine Gatineau <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> >> I might ask a stupid question but isn't hal used to manage the >> UPS device >> and connection through udev rules? >> I though that hal was mostly usefull with usb... >> >> In the nut-hal document, it is said that HAL "allows NUT >> drivers to feed the >> HAL system, which will itself feeds >> applications such as the Gnome Power Manager" >> Does that mean hal is not used for managing the battery itself >> but sees the >> nut driver as a "pseudo real battery"? In this case, indeed, >> I do not need >> it. >> I use upsmon for power management. >> >> >> not at all. there are 2 approaches: >> - the standard one, where you have a driver (usbhid-ups), upsd and >> upsmon. >> udev only applies the device privileges rules. >> - the Integrated Power Management approach, where NUT USB driver >> can feed data to HAL (instead of upsd), replacing the basic >> USB/HID support in HAL. >> Note that HAL is being superseded by DeviceKit and DeviceKit-power. >> This approach will probably be abandonned... >> >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Charles Lepple [mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>] >> Envoyé : vendredi 31 juillet 2009 15:08 >> À : Antoine Gatineau >> Cc : 'nut-upsuser' >> Objet : Re: [Nut-upsuser] Usbhip-ups going wild >> >> On Jul 31, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Antoine Gatineau wrote: >> >> > Indeed, nut depends on some packages not the distribution >> itself. >> > You are surely right. >> > >> > Anyway, here are the links : >> > RHEL 4 : ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/EPEL/4ES/SRPMS/ >> > nut-2.2.0-4.el4.src.rpm >> > RHEL 5 : nut-2.4.1 found only on this one >> > http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/nut/SRPM/ >> >> >> use that one. >> install it and edit the spec. >> modifying --with-all by --with-usb should be sufficient. >> >> cheers, >> Arnaud >> -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops >> Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - >> http://www.networkupstools.org/ >> Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org >> Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Nut-upsuser mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser >
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
