On Sep 1, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Kostas Oikonomou wrote:
W.r.t. to Arnaud's suggestion, yes, I did that in order to get the
UPS working in the first place:
pfexec /usr/sbin/add_drv -i '"usb9ae,1008.10"' -m '* 0660 nut ups'
ugen
I verified that this is still valid by doing "prtconf -v" which
yields (sorry for long output)
....
[trimmed]
The important thing is the 'compatible' entry above, which includes
'usb9ae,1008.10'.
Anyhow, doesn't the fact that
pfexec /opt/nut/2.6.1/bin/usbhid-ups -DD -a eco550 -u root
works fine indicate that the ugen driver is ok?
The uhid -> ugen thing is only part of the problem. I assumed that the
"0660 nut ups" part of the command was for permissions, but later you
also mentioned another device node:
"Sorry for all these emails: finally, it was a permissions problem on
the usb device itself, i.e.
/devices/pci@0,0/pci103c,2a6c@2/*
Thanks very much for all your help."
I have no idea how to get those permissions to stick, though.
--
Charles Lepple
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
