Here comes the output:
root@abex:~# /lib/nut/snmp-ups -DDDD -a apc10001 -k
Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.66 (2.6.4)
0.000000 debug level is '4'
0.000446 SNMP UPS driver : entering upsdrv_initups()
0.000471 SNMP UPS driver : entering nut_snmp_init(snmp-ups)
0.018439 SNMP UPS driver : entering load_mib2nut(apcc)
0.018467 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'apcc' mib
0.018478 Entering nut_snmp_get_str()
0.018499 nut_snmp_get(.1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.1.1.1.0)
0.035932 load_mib2nut: using apcc mib
0.035963 su_find_info: "ups.model" found
0.035980 Entering nut_snmp_get_str()
0.036007 nut_snmp_get(.1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.1.1.1.0)
0.055572 Detected Smart-UPS 1000 on host 10.100.200.30 (mib: apcc 1.1)
0.055610 su_find_info: unknown info type (load.off.delay)
0.055630 su_find_info: unknown info type (load.on.delay)
0.055668 su_find_info: unknown info type (load.off.delay)
0.055687 Initiating UPS shutdown
0.055705 upsdrv_shutdown...
0.055721 entering su_instcmd(shutdown.return, (null))
0.055740 su_find_info: "shutdown.return" found
0.055771 entering nut_snmp_set (.1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.6.1.1.0, i, 2)
0.098838 [apc10001] nut_snmp_set: can't set .1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.6.1.1.0: Error in packet: (genError) A general failure occured
0.098870 su_instcmd: cannot set value for shutdown.return
0.098888 entering su_instcmd(shutdown.reboot, (null))
0.098919 su_find_info: unknown info type (shutdown.reboot)
0.098938 su_instcmd: shutdown.reboot unavailable
0.098955 entering su_instcmd(load.off.delay, (null))
0.098981 su_find_info: unknown info type (load.off.delay)
0.098993 su_instcmd: load.off.delay unavailable
0.099026 Shutdown failed!
Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.66 (2.6.4)
0.000000 debug level is '4'
0.000446 SNMP UPS driver : entering upsdrv_initups()
0.000471 SNMP UPS driver : entering nut_snmp_init(snmp-ups)
0.018439 SNMP UPS driver : entering load_mib2nut(apcc)
0.018467 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'apcc' mib
0.018478 Entering nut_snmp_get_str()
0.018499 nut_snmp_get(.1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.1.1.1.0)
0.035932 load_mib2nut: using apcc mib
0.035963 su_find_info: "ups.model" found
0.035980 Entering nut_snmp_get_str()
0.036007 nut_snmp_get(.1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.1.1.1.0)
0.055572 Detected Smart-UPS 1000 on host 10.100.200.30 (mib: apcc 1.1)
0.055610 su_find_info: unknown info type (load.off.delay)
0.055630 su_find_info: unknown info type (load.on.delay)
0.055668 su_find_info: unknown info type (load.off.delay)
0.055687 Initiating UPS shutdown
0.055705 upsdrv_shutdown...
0.055721 entering su_instcmd(shutdown.return, (null))
0.055740 su_find_info: "shutdown.return" found
0.055771 entering nut_snmp_set (.1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.6.1.1.0, i, 2)
0.098838 [apc10001] nut_snmp_set: can't set .1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.6.1.1.0: Error in packet: (genError) A general failure occured
0.098870 su_instcmd: cannot set value for shutdown.return
0.098888 entering su_instcmd(shutdown.reboot, (null))
0.098919 su_find_info: unknown info type (shutdown.reboot)
0.098938 su_instcmd: shutdown.reboot unavailable
0.098955 entering su_instcmd(load.off.delay, (null))
0.098981 su_find_info: unknown info type (load.off.delay)
0.098993 su_instcmd: load.off.delay unavailable
0.099026 Shutdown failed!
I tried to set "Minimum battery level for restart after power off (percent)" to 90. And this gave "90" as mentioned below. I saw in apc-mib.c that the type for this is declared as ST_FLAG_STRING. This is abolutely no string (so no 's' but 'i' would be correct).
What do you say?
-lutzn
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2013 um 14:34 Uhr
Von: "Charles Lepple" <clep...@gmail.com>
An: lutz.niede...@gmx.net
Cc: nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
Betreff: Re: [Nut-upsuser] APC AP9617 SNMP returns strange errors
Von: "Charles Lepple" <clep...@gmail.com>
An: lutz.niede...@gmx.net
Cc: nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
Betreff: Re: [Nut-upsuser] APC AP9617 SNMP returns strange errors
On May 15, 2013, at 8:18 AM, lutz.niede...@gmx.net wrote:
> So maybe a problem with "90" vs 90 ?
Probably. I don't have an SNMP-capable UPS here, so if you could send the logs from passing the debug flags the driver directly (/lib/nut/snmp-ups -DDDD -a apc10001 -k), it would be easier for me to follow along in the code. I recommend saving the log to a file (via 'script' or 'tee') and compressing it to keep the list post to a reasonable size.
I suspect that the type is coming from the SNMP MIB definition. Could you also send the ups.conf file contents?
--
Charles Lepple
clepple@gmail
> So maybe a problem with "90" vs 90 ?
Probably. I don't have an SNMP-capable UPS here, so if you could send the logs from passing the debug flags the driver directly (/lib/nut/snmp-ups -DDDD -a apc10001 -k), it would be easier for me to follow along in the code. I recommend saving the log to a file (via 'script' or 'tee') and compressing it to keep the list post to a reasonable size.
I suspect that the type is coming from the SNMP MIB definition. Could you also send the ups.conf file contents?
--
Charles Lepple
clepple@gmail
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser