On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 23:33 -0400, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jul 17, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Matt Ivie wrote: > > > I'm really just looking for a UPS that might run a couple of small > > servers and other small devices(routers or switches). > > Good call on including the network gear in the power budget. NUT isn't much > use to the slave systems if the network connection between master and slave > goes down. > > > If I could get > > 15-30 minutes of runtime from the batts and o course run the automated > > shutdown and reboot sequence through nut that would be great. The server > > I'm looking at has a PSU capable of 200W but I don't expect to be maxing > > out the system capabilities at all. I'll be running either Debian > > Wheezy(most likely) or Trisquel 6.0 and I'd like to just use the > > pre-packaged version of NUT rather than building a new package if I can. > > It doesn't look like I can just copy-and-paste the link to the exact result, > but if you go to the UPS selector on the Eaton Power Quality page, they will > recommend a few models: > > http://powerquality.eaton.com/ > > The NUT HCL spells out Powerware 9130/9140, but the Eaton pages refer to > PW9130 and PW9140. Pretty sure they are the same unit with a different name. > > Debian wheezy has NUT 2.6.4, which should cover most of the units that > Eaton's selector would recommend. > > You could also go with a Tripplite rack-mount UPS, but a lot of the low-end > ones use a proprietary protocol that seems to change between model years. >
What about the Eaton 5S series? Does it go under a different name on the compatibility list or is it just not compatible? -- ________________________________________________________________________ Matt Ivie BT Inc Information Technology _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
