On Sat, 10 Aug 2013, Charles Lepple wrote:
I still haven't messed with systemd yet, so I am in over my head here. Is this similar to what Kjell posted about? Or is it in addition to that? http://www.kepstin.ca/blog/networkupstoolsnutandsystemd/
Calvin Walton (kepstin) discusses a complete management of all the NUT processes using systemd and in doing so fixes a timing conflict in the minimalist systemd support provided by Fedora; whereas my post addresses the much narrower "bug fix" question of getting NUT to work on just one version of openSUSE. I do not address the question of full systemd management of NUT processes.
systemd is gaining ground in the Linux world [See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemd "Adoption"] and looks as if it is here to stay. The Linux distributions will slowly, one by one, get around to probably minimalist systemd support for NUT. But the BSD world has not accepted systemd, and this poses a problem for the management of projects such as NUT which cater for Unix as well as Linux. [http://lwn.net/Articles/452865/ "Debian debates systemd"] It seems to me that although there is no immediate urgency, some experimentation might be helpful in forming a clearer view of what is needed for NUT.
Roger _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
